Research
The big questions we get excited about
Around 600 million years ago, single cell animals started getting together in a big way. Over
a relatively short period, an enormous proliferation of multicellular
animals appear in the fossil record.
The single celled animals split from plants around double that number of years ago. This fork in
the road entailed two different strategies for the acquisition of energy: the "sit and absorb"
strategy of the plants, and the "move around and get it" strategy of animals.
Animal bodies are all about this strategy. Mechanical structures such as skeletons, actuation
systems such as muscles, and sensing and control structures such as the nervous system,
participate in making "move around and get it" the most successful strategy the
planet has ever seen, leading to animals with baroquely complex, huge nervous systems that are
able to visit other planets and knit colorful socks.
We would like to understand the principles that make animals work. It's a problem that
spans mechanics (musculoskeletal systems), control and sensing (nervous systems),
and behavior most proximally, and ecology and evolution more
distally. While many of most interesting challenges are in the realm of understanding
the nervous system, we firmly believe that we can only understand the nervous system
when we pay rigorous attention to the mechanical and behavioral sides of the issue, and
we design our behavioral experiments with regard to what we know about an animal's ecology.
How we approach the big questions
We are committed to highly quantitative approaches that integrate engineering, simulation,
and robotics with more traditional physiological approaches. The reason for this is
that we believe analytical approaches to complex systems, where we break the problem
down into simpler subproblems and model these, need to be complemented with
synthetic approaches, where we build simulations and physical mechanisms, such as
robots, to test our theories. A nice side effect of this commitment, given the fractal
nature of biological systems where each subcomponent of a problem opens up into
potentially lifelong research programs, is a type of “saliency filter” which says
that if pursuit of some research problem isn't going to help fix a
problem in our simulations or robots, then we probably won't be working on it.
From big questions to little problems
Currently, we focus on one animal for insights into these questions, an active sensing animal which senses its
world through the emission
of a weak electric field. This is the weakly electric fish, a fascinating animal that hunts in the dark through
sensing perturbations of its self-generated field. This animal has been the subject of years of modeling
efforts, allowing us to pursue more intricate issues.
Why electric fish? As a fish, their brains are midrange in complexity (in terms of number of distinct
neuronal cell groups in the brain, among other measures) between animals with very small nervous systems
such as fruit flies or nematodes like C. elegans, which are also popular “model systems” in neurobiology,
and animals with very large nervous systems, such as mammals. This affords certain advantages in terms of analysis.
In addition, because they sense with electricity, it is quite convenient to generate and control input
to the nervous system. Finally, mechanically they are relatively simple while being quite intriguing (for example
they often swim backwards!). Thus, making connections between biomechanics and neural processing is facilitated.
The active research projects on this system include
Some images and movies of our research can be found in the
Uropatagium. Software and data to reproduce the results
of more recent work (
AnimalLab)
is also available.
|
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
|
|
 
 
 
 
|
Our research group pursues both empirical and modeling efforts in mechanics and neurobiology,
integrating the two together within simulation environments.
|
 
 
 
 
 
 
|